Democrats   

  Letters To The Editor

 

TAXES: Republican Plan Would Mean More Total
by Ken Robison

Published in Coeur d'Alene Press
August 11, 2006

The result of the Republican tax plan to be considered in a special legislative session would be more total taxes for most Idahoans. There would be a huge tax shift with a higher sales tax to pay for property tax cuts for large property-owning corporations that need no tax relief.

The plan does nothing to remedy the basic property tax problem and continued inflation in the taxable value of homes.

With no further adjustment of the homeowner exemption to offset inflation, most homeowners would get little relief with the GOP school levy replacement plan. In a year or two, any property tax savings would be offset by further increases in the taxable value of the home. But homeowners would continue to pay more sales tax.

The Legislature could provide more help to homes by further updating the $75,000 upper limit on the homeowner exemption or by removing the limit. This would require no state revenue and no sales tax increase.

But the primary purpose of the proposed plan is not to help homeowners, but to satisfy the campaign of the industry lobby, the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry, for tax cuts for its corporate members. IACI is the primary sponsor of this plan.

IACI wants more tax cuts for its members even though commercial and utility property has paid less property tax in recent years because homeowners have paid more. Residential taxes have increased four times as fast as non-residential property taxes. Total commercial, utility and farm taxes have increased just 13 percent in five years, nearly all of that with new commercial construction.

Inflation in the taxable value of commercial property has averaged only 1 percent, total utility property taxes have gone down in each of the last three years.

In addition, IACI members have benefited from business tax cuts approved by the Legislature.

With the proposed plan:

• Homeowners get no net tax relief. They would pay $104 million less property tax, but $105 million more sales tax. Property tax savings would average $275, but most would pay $200 to $400 more sales tax.

• With further increases in taxable value, property taxes on homes would be just as high or higher in a year or two.

• Renters would lose, paying more sales tax but receiving no corresponding benefit.

• Most businesses would lose, paying more in sales tax on business-related purchases than their property tax benefit. This applies particularly to businesses that lease space or are home-based.

• Schools would lose. The legislative majority would gain more control over school funding at the expense of local control.

IACI helped kill every bill in the Legislature to update the homeowner exemption from 1992 to 2005. The result of the industry lobby's influence with the Republican majority was a huge tax shift and outrageous increases in taxes on homes.

During the regular 2006 session, IACI opposed even the modest $25,000 update in the homeowner exemption that eventually passed. And, the Republican majority refused to consider a more realistic update.

IACI's officers and directors represent many of the major companies doing business in Idaho, including Idaho Power Co., Avista, Intermountain Gas Co., Qwest, J.R. Simplot Co., Micron Technology, Monsanto, Potlatch, Washington Group International, Albertsons, Hewlett Packard, Union Pacific Corp., Bank of Idaho and Wells Fargo.

While most Idahoans would lose with the proposed tax shift, those companies would gain.

Ken Robison

 

 

Suggestions and submissions for this page may be sent to:
Web Master

 

 

Back Home.